DPR Fast-Tracks RUU KUHAP: When the Law Becomes the Trap
Published · Updated · By Satya Pramesi
On 14 November 2025, the DPR commission greenlit the revised Criminal Procedural Code (RUU KUHAP) for a plenary vote on 18 November. The draft grants investigators broader powers to arrest and detain individuals before formal suspect status or confirmed crimes—methods some label as entrapment. It also allows phone surveillance, bank account freezes, and asset seizures without court approval. Civil society groups have criticized the accelerated process, highlighting the draft’s limited public access. As of now, the full text remains absent from the DPR’s official website.
What Actually Happened
| # | Claim | Date | Entities | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | On 14 November 2025, a commission of Indonesia's DPR agreed to advance the revised Criminal Procedural Code (RUU KUHAP) to a plenary vote. | DPR, RUU KUHAP | Kompas.com (archived) | |
| 2 | The plenary vote for RUU KUHAP was scheduled for 18 November 2025. | RUU KUHAP, DPR | Katadata (archived) | |
| 3 | The announcement of the RUU KUHAP advancement was condemned by a coalition of civil society organizations. | RUU KUHAP, Civil Society Organizations | Asia Pacific Solidarity Network (republishing YLBHI press release) (archived) | |
| 4 | The RUU KUHAP draft allows investigators to arrest and detain individuals before a crime is confirmed. | RUU KUHAP, Investigators | Asia Pacific Solidarity Network (republishing YLBHI press release) (archived) | |
| 5 | The RUU KUHAP draft allows investigators to arrest and detain individuals before anyone is named a suspect. | RUU KUHAP, Investigators | Asia Pacific Solidarity Network (republishing YLBHI press release) (archived) | |
| 6 | Critics describe the new investigative methods in RUU KUHAP as entrapment, or inducing individuals to commit a crime. | RUU KUHAP, Investigative Methods | BBC News Indonesia (archived) | |
| 7 | The RUU KUHAP draft permits phone surveillance without judicial permission. | RUU KUHAP | BBC News Indonesia (archived) | |
| 8 | The RUU KUHAP draft permits blocking bank accounts without judicial permission. | RUU KUHAP | BBC News Indonesia (archived) | |
| 9 | The RUU KUHAP draft permits seizing assets without judicial permission. | RUU KUHAP | Asia Pacific Solidarity Network (republishing YLBHI press release) (archived) | |
| 10 | The latest version of the RUU KUHAP draft is not available on the DPR’s official website. | RUU KUHAP, DPR | Kompas TV (archived) | |
| 11 | The DPR's plenary session passed RUU KUHAP into law on 18 November 2025 as scheduled, despite student protests and criticism from a civil-society coalition at the session itself. | DPR, RUU KUHAP | CNN Indonesia (archived) | |
| 12 | The new law (Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025) took effect on 2 January 2026, alongside the new national criminal code (KUHP). | RUU KUHAP, KUHP | Sekretariat Negara (State Secretariat) (archived) | |
| 13 | In February 2026, twelve petitioners — including two people who were made suspects during the May Day 2025 labor protest — filed a judicial review at the Constitutional Court challenging the new KUHAP's investigator search/seizure and 'other lawful actions' provisions as unconstitutionally vague. | RUU KUHAP, Constitutional Court | CNN Indonesia (archived) | |
| 14 | On 16 March 2026 the Constitutional Court declined to rule on the merits of that petition, finding the petitioners lacked legal standing because their criminal cases had been processed under the old code before the new KUHAP's effective date. | Constitutional Court, RUU KUHAP | CNN Indonesia (archived) |
Last Friday, 14 November 2025, the DPR’s commission decided—because why not—that the revised Criminal Procedural Code, or RUU KUHAP, should waltz its way to a plenary vote. Scheduled for Tuesday, 18 November 2025, because apparently, 270 million people’s rights can’t wait for a long weekend. Civil society, of course, threw up their hands and called it what it is. [1] [2] [3] [4]
Now, the fun part: the draft hands investigators the kind of power usually reserved for Bond villains. Arrest you before a crime exists? Sure. Detain you before you’re even a suspect? Of course. And if you’re wondering how they’ll manage that, well, entrapment is on the table—state actors gently nudging you into crimes you’d never dream of committing. The burden of proof, in my opinion, seems to have taken a coffee break. [5] [6]
But wait, there’s more. Phone surveillance? No problem. Freeze your bank account? Easy. Seize your assets? Why not. And the best part? None of it requires a judge’s blessing. [7] [8]
Then there’s the transparency. The latest draft isn’t exactly front and center on the DPR’s website. No, you’ll have to dig it up on some external link, like a treasure hunt where the prize is your own disenfranchisement. Legislation for 270 million people, hidden away like a membership form for an exclusive club. [9] [10]
In fairness, you’d think a bill this transformative—one that redraws the lines between citizen and suspect—might get a proper public airing. But no. It’s being rushed through like a last-minute tax bill. The only thing moving faster than the timeline is the principle of accountability, apparently sprinting in the opposite direction. The original question was What can we do? And the answer, as ever, is: ask nicely. Or, in my opinion, demand that the people’s representatives remember who pays their salaries.
Until then, the RUU KUHAP stands as a helpful reminder: in Indonesia, the law isn’t just on the state’s side. Sometimes, it’s the net. Make of that what you will.
What has happened since
The plenary vote, as scheduled, went ahead. On 18 November 2025, the DPR passed RUU KUHAP into law while students protested and civil society shouted into the void. [11] Law No. 20/2025 then took effect on 2 January 2026, right on time, alongside the revised KUHP. [12]
The first real test came in February 2026, when twelve petitioners—including two who’d been named suspects in the May Day 2025 labor protests—asked the Constitutional Court to strike down the law’s vague provisions on search, seizure, and “other lawful actions.” [13] On 16 March 2026, the Court declined to weigh in, ruling the petitioners lacked standing because their cases had been processed under the old code. A technicality, in other words. [14]
Sources
- Kompas.com (archived)
- Katadata (archived)
- Asia Pacific Solidarity Network (republishing YLBHI press release) (archived)
- BBC News Indonesia (archived)
- Kompas TV (archived)
- CNN Indonesia (archived)
- Sekretariat Negara (State Secretariat) (archived)
- CNN Indonesia (archived)
- CNN Indonesia (archived)
Original video: TikTok source